Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Jan Andrew Bloxham's avatar

"We'll go down in history as the first society that wouldn't save itself because it wasn't cost-effective." - Kurt Vonnegut

I like the graphs that show us talking about things superimposed on rising CO2 levels. It's the bottom-up way of admitting facts by just observing them: You don't have to understand humanity's malfunction to correctly identify the problem. The proof is in the pudding. All you have to do is look.

But even that is hard, and so we move on to figuring out why all humans live in their own realities. Above the philosophical level of observing and explaining this, is, I do believe, the scientific level.

According to How Minds Change by David McRaney, science shows how we disambiguate ambiguous facts (right down to what colour the famous dress was in 2015) based on our priors, ie. the experiences we have each been exposed to in our lives. Our subjective realities seem objective to each of us.

And so, the ability to live with intellectual curiosity and honesty and to change one's mind when presented with gainsaying evidence would be a wonderful thing for everyone to excel in. Clearly, that has never been and will never be the case, and so we must resort instead to "people skills" in order to change people's minds.

Expand full comment
Fabian Schildknecht's avatar

Obviously there is no easy way to stay close to +1.5C, as it won‘t be easy to implement global climate compensation. But it must be possible! At least I don’t see an alternative to this initiative at all. (Let us) go for it!

Expand full comment
3 more comments...

No posts