Thank you Henrik for this very clear presentation, that graph showing the strong correlation between the GDP growth and the CO2 emissions growth, and then the pledges to (abruptly) break/decouple the GDP growth from CO2 emissions, is very revealing about the "seriousness" of those agreements.
Taxing directly the fossil fuel extraction companies makes a lot of sense, I think it is similar to the model used for the tobacco industry, tax heavily the producers to dissuade the users from smoking.
How much of today’s mess is due to 30 years stalling actions of the WEF in Davos and other greenwashing events?
Thank you Henrik for this very clear presentation, that graph showing the strong correlation between the GDP growth and the CO2 emissions growth, and then the pledges to (abruptly) break/decouple the GDP growth from CO2 emissions, is very revealing about the "seriousness" of those agreements.
Taxing directly the fossil fuel extraction companies makes a lot of sense, I think it is similar to the model used for the tobacco industry, tax heavily the producers to dissuade the users from smoking.
The explanation is getting better and better Henrik. Thanks for all your hard work!