I think an underlying perspective that needs to shift, is economic change is not a reflection of all relevant factors, negative outcomes. In relation to our arts foundation, our financial turn over declined, so it's easy to at first assume "business slowed" therefore there less profits etc. But the activity was actually steadily increasing, so it's like the formula for operations/achieving strategic goals (or purpose) was achieved when we let some of the 'noise' die down . In summary, what is enough? Can more be done with less?
I attended the "climate leaders forum" at south pole in Zurich last Wednesday. It seems as if a lot of companies try very hard to act sustainable especially in the sense of low THG-emissions. The main question was/is : who pays for this effort? the customers?
I think an underlying perspective that needs to shift, is economic change is not a reflection of all relevant factors, negative outcomes. In relation to our arts foundation, our financial turn over declined, so it's easy to at first assume "business slowed" therefore there less profits etc. But the activity was actually steadily increasing, so it's like the formula for operations/achieving strategic goals (or purpose) was achieved when we let some of the 'noise' die down . In summary, what is enough? Can more be done with less?
I completely agree.
I attended the "climate leaders forum" at south pole in Zurich last Wednesday. It seems as if a lot of companies try very hard to act sustainable especially in the sense of low THG-emissions. The main question was/is : who pays for this effort? the customers?
I agree Henrik - all solid assumptions for me.